Wednesday 25th September
Justin Peck’s: ‘In the countenance of Kings’ by Sanfrancisco
Ballet
I really like this piece of dance as its very well
choreographed and it allows you to make your own interpretation of what the
piece is trying to promote to the audience, furthermore I like the way it
breaks away from what is typically associated with ballet through the use of
dress codes and the way there is a more neo classical feel to the routine.
The piece makes me feel very excited as there is so much going
on, for example there is a constant change of pattern, also the dynamics in the
music continuously change which reflects on the movements making some stand out
more. Justin Peck always chooses a piece of music first and uses this as a
stimulus to then develop his routine; this makes his choreography very lyrical
as the dynamics in the music relate to the movements. Both these things create
a feeling suspense as it is impossible to predict what is going to happen next.
The dancers work very well together as they are always in
time with each other and the music. Furthermore it is important for them to all
have good spatial awareness in order for them to not clash into each other when
moving into a different pattern. The dancers move in a very balletic way with
some rather fluid soft parts, contrasting to the sharp dynamic movements which
are also expressed.
It is evident that Justin spends a lot of time coming up
with and drawing out patterns, as there were many interesting shapes and
patterns shown, for example: there is
the use of a triangle where the main woman featured is at the point of the
shape with her partner, whilst the other two couple are placed behind them on a
diagonal. At one point the dancers are placed very close together in organised rows
to create a sense of team work and to present a supportive environment. Lastly,
there is a continuous use of staggered lines during group pas de deux sections
to enable the audience to see each couple.
I recognise the majority of the movements during the piece
as they are rather balletic, for example there is a continuous use of: ten leve
jumps, arabesque, sissones, grande jete en tournen, assemble, ombuoite. Justin
states that he doesn’t make up any of his own movements but alters traditional
ones to give them a modern feel. Moreover, many choreographic devices are used for
instance; unison, repetition, inversion, accumulation are all shown at some
point in the routine.
There are endless interpretations the audience can make as
to what the message is behind the routine. Overall I think the two main ideas
Justin Peck had when creating this piece were that he wanted to present a
feeling of freedom similarly whilst breaking away from typical dance
stereotypes, also all the dancers are dancing individually but move together as
one creating the idea of teamwork. Additionally, the dance world is typically
seen as very competitive whereas this dance piece breaks away from this
stereotype and creates a sense that dance unites everyone and encourages all,
furthermore evoking the idea of equality as no dancers are particularly singled
out as being the best. At the very beginning of the routine the main woman is
lying on the floor in an empty studio looking exhausted and sounding breathless,
this quickly changes as she looks into the mirror at someone who she wants to
be, through her body language I can tell that she has more confidence.
Automatically the mood changes when the music begins-the dancer becomes alive. The
idea of freedom is shown through the way the lady has her hair down and not in
a bun and all the dancers are wearing trainers instead of typical ballet shoes,
both these aspects are used to try and break away from the strictness of
ballet, whilst creating a more modern feel. I really like the message Justin is
trying to communicate to his audience, and I think he demonstrates this very
well through the use of his choreography.
Edmund Feldman came up with a method of criticism, overall stating that before critiquing a dance, you must observe it. Analysis explains how the parts fit together to make a whole, interpretation means having a personal observation and evaluation is your own judgement of the work. He then came up with a model of criticism for dance pieces, in which I will use as a guide when critiquing choreographers work.
Bibliography:
Video of dance: Youtube.com. (2019). YouTube. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMTv_Y0Zrl4 [Accessed 6 Dec. 2019].
Edmund Feldman came up with a method of criticism, overall stating that before critiquing a dance, you must observe it. Analysis explains how the parts fit together to make a whole, interpretation means having a personal observation and evaluation is your own judgement of the work. He then came up with a model of criticism for dance pieces, in which I will use as a guide when critiquing choreographers work.
Bibliography:
Video of dance: Youtube.com. (2019). YouTube. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMTv_Y0Zrl4 [Accessed 6 Dec. 2019].
You have written a detailed piece about his work and have touched upon different visual images in the choreography. You have made an interesting point about how the dance makes you feel it is showing dance uniting people as there is no lead but they dance together.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your comment Eliza!
DeleteI really like the fact you have explored his piece in great detail and highlighted many points in your blog. You have included a section of movements you recognise, this shows how much you have watched the piece in order to explore the movements in a more valid way. Has watching this piece inspired any ideas for your choreography?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment Abi. Yes definitely! I have been really inspired by Justin Pecks style of dancing and specifically some of his movements, therefore I will be incorporating his style in my own choreography.
DeleteI enjoyed reading your interpretations of the piece and your have supported your ideas by picking out certain details from the piece, such as talking about the female dancer's body language. In what way does Justin Peck alter traditional movements to make them more modern - does he add embellishments, or is it the way the dancers execute the steps?
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your comment Daisy! I would say that the dancers execute the steps in a more fluid relaxed way, contrasting to the strict well placed way the movements are traditionally shown. But also, Justin Peck adds his own unique embellishments to make some movements have a more modern feel.
Delete